Reasons to choose d330 motion
Released in 2002, d330 motion has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.34 MP effective resolution, and a 180 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei d330 motion
vs Rollei dt 3200
VS
Sensor area
21 mm²
d330 motion25 mm²
dt 3200- Area ratio
- 1.17:1
- Absolute difference
- 4 mm²
- Relative difference
- 16.5%
The dt 3200 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
d330 motionMetricdt 3200
3.34 MPEffective pixels3.25 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.53 µmPixel pitch2.76 µm
6.38 µm²Pixel area7.64 µm²
15.67 MP/cm²Pixel density13.08 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
180 gWeight185 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AABattery—
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The dt 3200 has the larger sensor area. The d330 motion has the lighter body. The d330 motion has the higher effective resolution. The dt 3200 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose dt 3200
Released in 2003, dt 3200 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 3.25 MP effective resolution, and a 185 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.