CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei d33 com
vs Yakumo Mega Image 35

Archive illustration for Rollei d33 com

Rollei / 2001

d33 com

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Yakumo Mega Image 35

Yakumo / 2003

Mega Image 35

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
d33 com
38 mm²
Mega Image 35
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The d33 com and Mega Image 35 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

d33 comMetricMega Image 35
3.31 MPEffective pixels3.3 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.38 µmPixel pitch3.39 µm
11.45 µm²Pixel area11.48 µm²
8.73 MP/cm²Pixel density8.71 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
280 gWeight245 g
CompactFlash type IStorageCompactFlash type I
4x AABattery4x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The d33 com and Mega Image 35 have the same sensor area. The Mega Image 35 has the lighter body. The d33 com has the higher effective resolution. The Mega Image 35 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose d33 com

Released in 2001, d33 com has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.31 MP effective resolution, and a 280 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Mega Image 35

Released in 2003, Mega Image 35 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.3 MP effective resolution, and a 245 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras