CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei d210 motion
vs Rollei Prego da4

Archive illustration for Rollei d210 motion

Rollei / 2004

d210 motion

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei Prego da4

Rollei / 2004

Prego da4

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

15 mm²
d210 motion
25 mm²
Prego da4
Area ratio
1.64:1
Absolute difference
10 mm²
Relative difference
63.8%

The Prego da4 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

d210 motionMetricPrego da4
2.1 MPEffective pixels4.1 MP
4.5 × 3.37Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.69 µmPixel pitch2.46 µm
7.22 µm²Pixel area6.06 µm²
13.85 MP/cm²Pixel density16.51 MP/cm²
7.7Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight167 g
Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AABattery1x CR-V3, 2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Prego da4 has the larger sensor area. The d210 motion has the lighter body. The Prego da4 has the higher effective resolution. The d210 motion and Prego da4 were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose d210 motion

Released in 2004, d210 motion has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 2.1 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Prego da4

Released in 2004, Prego da4 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.1 MP effective resolution, and a 167 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras