CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei d210 motion
vs Rollei dpx 310

Archive illustration for Rollei d210 motion

Rollei / 2004

d210 motion

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei dpx 310

Rollei / 2005

dpx 310

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

15 mm²
d210 motion
21 mm²
dpx 310
Area ratio
1.41:1
Absolute difference
6 mm²
Relative difference
40.6%

The dpx 310 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

d210 motionMetricdpx 310
2.1 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
4.5 × 3.37Sensor5.33 × 4
2.69 µmPixel pitch2.62 µm
7.22 µm²Pixel area6.88 µm²
13.85 MP/cm²Pixel density14.54 MP/cm²
7.7Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight160 g
Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AABattery1x CR-V3, 2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The dpx 310 has the larger sensor area. The d210 motion has the lighter body. The dpx 310 has the higher effective resolution. The dpx 310 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose d210 motion

Released in 2004, d210 motion has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 2.1 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose dpx 310

Released in 2005, dpx 310 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras