CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei Compactline 81
vs Samsung L110

Archive illustration for Rollei Compactline 81

Rollei / 2010

Compactline 81

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung L110

Samsung / 2008

L110

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
Compactline 81
25 mm²
L110
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Compactline 81 and L110 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Compactline 81MetricL110
8 MPEffective pixels8.2 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.76 µmPixel pitch1.74 µm
3.11 µm²Pixel area3.03 µm²
32.21 MP/cm²Pixel density33.01 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
82 gWeight154 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageInternal storage
2x AAABatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Compactline 81 and L110 have the same sensor area. The Compactline 81 has the lighter body. The L110 has the higher effective resolution. The Compactline 81 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Compactline 81

Released in 2010, Compactline 81 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 82 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose L110

Released in 2008, L110 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8.2 MP effective resolution, and a 154 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras