CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei Compactline 81
vs Rollei Flexline 100 iT

Archive illustration for Rollei Compactline 81

Rollei / 2010

Compactline 81

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei Flexline 100 iT

Rollei / 2010

Flexline 100 iT

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
Compactline 81
25 mm²
Flexline 100 iT
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Compactline 81 and Flexline 100 iT have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Compactline 81MetricFlexline 100 iT
8 MPEffective pixels10 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.76 µmPixel pitch1.58 µm
3.11 µm²Pixel area2.48 µm²
32.21 MP/cm²Pixel density40.26 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
82 gWeight107 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStoragemicroSD, microSDHC
2x AAABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Compactline 81 and Flexline 100 iT have the same sensor area. The Compactline 81 has the lighter body. The Flexline 100 iT has the higher effective resolution. The Compactline 81 and Flexline 100 iT were both released in 2010. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Compactline 81

Released in 2010, Compactline 81 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 82 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Flexline 100 iT

Released in 2010, Flexline 100 iT has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 107 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras