CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei Compactline 80
vs Rollei XS-8 Crystal

Archive illustration for Rollei Compactline 80

Rollei / 2008

Compactline 80

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei XS-8 Crystal

Rollei / 2009

XS-8 Crystal

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
Compactline 80
25 mm²
XS-8 Crystal
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Compactline 80 and XS-8 Crystal have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Compactline 80MetricXS-8 Crystal
8 MPEffective pixels8 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.76 µmPixel pitch1.76 µm
3.11 µm²Pixel area3.11 µm²
32.21 MP/cm²Pixel density32.21 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
140 gWeight114 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Compactline 80 and XS-8 Crystal have the same sensor area. The XS-8 Crystal has the lighter body. The Compactline 80 and XS-8 Crystal have the same effective resolution. The XS-8 Crystal is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Compactline 80

Released in 2008, Compactline 80 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose XS-8 Crystal

Released in 2009, XS-8 Crystal has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 114 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras