CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei Compactline 50
vs Rollei Compactline 90

Archive illustration for Rollei Compactline 50

Rollei / 2009

Compactline 50

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei Compactline 90

Rollei / 2009

Compactline 90

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
Compactline 50
28 mm²
Compactline 90
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Compactline 50 and Compactline 90 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Compactline 50MetricCompactline 90
5 MPEffective pixels9 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
2.39 µmPixel pitch1.78 µm
5.69 µm²Pixel area3.16 µm²
17.57 MP/cm²Pixel density31.62 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
82 gWeight134 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Compactline 50 and Compactline 90 have the same sensor area. The Compactline 50 has the lighter body. The Compactline 90 has the higher effective resolution. The Compactline 50 and Compactline 90 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Compactline 50

Released in 2009, Compactline 50 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 82 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Compactline 90

Released in 2009, Compactline 90 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 9 MP effective resolution, and a 134 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras