CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei Compactline 425
vs Rollei Sportsline 99

Archive illustration for Rollei Compactline 425

Rollei / 2011

Compactline 425

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei Sportsline 99

Rollei / 2011

Sportsline 99

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
Compactline 425
28 mm²
Sportsline 99
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Compactline 425 and Sportsline 99 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Compactline 425MetricSportsline 99
14 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.43 µmPixel pitch1.43 µm
2.03 µm²Pixel area2.03 µm²
49.19 MP/cm²Pixel density49.19 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
105 gWeight140 g
SD/SDHCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
Alkaline batteries, 2x 1.5 V AABatteryRechargeable Lithium-ion Battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Compactline 425 and Sportsline 99 have the same sensor area. The Compactline 425 has the lighter body. The Compactline 425 and Sportsline 99 have the same effective resolution. The Compactline 425 and Sportsline 99 were both released in 2011. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Compactline 425

Released in 2011, Compactline 425 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 105 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Sportsline 99

Released in 2011, Sportsline 99 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras