Reasons to choose Compactline 302
Released in 2010, Compactline 302 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 114 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei Compactline 302
vs Rollei Powerflex 440
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Compactline 30228 mm²
Powerflex 440- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Compactline 302 and Powerflex 440 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
Compactline 302MetricPowerflex 440
12 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.52 µmPixel pitch1.41 µm
2.31 µm²Pixel area1.98 µm²
43.28 MP/cm²Pixel density50.5 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
114 gWeight114 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Compactline 302 and Powerflex 440 have the same sensor area. The Compactline 302 and Powerflex 440 have the same body weight. The Powerflex 440 has the higher effective resolution. The Compactline 302 and Powerflex 440 were both released in 2010. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Powerflex 440
Released in 2010, Powerflex 440 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 114 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.