Reasons to choose Compactline 230
Released in 2010, Compactline 230 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 121 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei Compactline 230
vs Rollei Compactline 412
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Compactline 23028 mm²
Compactline 412- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Compactline 230 and Compactline 412 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
Compactline 230MetricCompactline 412
12 MPEffective pixels12 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.52 µmPixel pitch1.52 µm
2.31 µm²Pixel area2.31 µm²
43.28 MP/cm²Pixel density43.28 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
121 gWeight104 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Compactline 230 and Compactline 412 have the same sensor area. The Compactline 412 has the lighter body. The Compactline 230 and Compactline 412 have the same effective resolution. The Compactline 230 and Compactline 412 were both released in 2010. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Compactline 412
Released in 2010, Compactline 412 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 104 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.