CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei Compactline 200
vs Rollei Sportsline 90

Archive illustration for Rollei Compactline 200

Rollei / 2009

Compactline 200

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei Sportsline 90

Rollei / 2009

Sportsline 90

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
Compactline 200
28 mm²
Sportsline 90
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Compactline 200 and Sportsline 90 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Compactline 200MetricSportsline 90
12 MPEffective pixels9 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.54 µmPixel pitch1.78 µm
2.37 µm²Pixel area3.16 µm²
42.17 MP/cm²Pixel density31.62 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
130 gWeight119 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery2x AAA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Compactline 200 and Sportsline 90 have the same sensor area. The Sportsline 90 has the lighter body. The Compactline 200 has the higher effective resolution. The Compactline 200 and Sportsline 90 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Compactline 200

Released in 2009, Compactline 200 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Sportsline 90

Released in 2009, Sportsline 90 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 9 MP effective resolution, and a 119 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras