Reasons to choose Compactline 110
Released in 2009, Compactline 110 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 115 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei Compactline 110
vs Rollei X-8 Compact
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
Compactline 11025 mm²
X-8 Compact- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Compactline 110 and X-8 Compact have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Compactline 110MetricX-8 Compact
10 MPEffective pixels8 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.58 µmPixel pitch1.76 µm
2.48 µm²Pixel area3.11 µm²
40.26 MP/cm²Pixel density32.21 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
115 gWeight115 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Compactline 110 and X-8 Compact have the same sensor area. The Compactline 110 and X-8 Compact have the same body weight. The Compactline 110 has the higher effective resolution. The Compactline 110 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose X-8 Compact
Released in 2008, X-8 Compact has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 115 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.