CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei Compactline 110
vs Rollei RCP-8527X

Archive illustration for Rollei Compactline 110

Rollei / 2009

Compactline 110

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei RCP-8527X

Rollei / 2008

RCP-8527X

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
Compactline 110
25 mm²
RCP-8527X
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Compactline 110 and RCP-8527X have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Compactline 110MetricRCP-8527X
10 MPEffective pixels8 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.58 µmPixel pitch1.76 µm
2.48 µm²Pixel area3.11 µm²
40.26 MP/cm²Pixel density32.21 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
115 gWeight132 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Compactline 110 and RCP-8527X have the same sensor area. The Compactline 110 has the lighter body. The Compactline 110 has the higher effective resolution. The Compactline 110 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Compactline 110

Released in 2009, Compactline 110 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 115 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose RCP-8527X

Released in 2008, RCP-8527X has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 132 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras