Reasons to choose Compactline 103
Released in 2010, Compactline 103 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 104 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei Compactline 103
vs Rollei Flexline 100
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Compactline 10325 mm²
Flexline 100- Area ratio
- 1.12:1
- Absolute difference
- 3 mm²
- Relative difference
- 11.6%
The Compactline 103 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
Compactline 103MetricFlexline 100
10 MPEffective pixels10 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.67 µmPixel pitch1.58 µm
2.77 µm²Pixel area2.48 µm²
36.07 MP/cm²Pixel density40.26 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
104 gWeight107 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStoragemicroSDHC
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Compactline 103 has the larger sensor area. The Compactline 103 has the lighter body. The Compactline 103 and Flexline 100 have the same effective resolution. The Compactline 103 and Flexline 100 were both released in 2010. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Flexline 100
Released in 2010, Flexline 100 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 107 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.