Reasons to choose Compactline 102
Released in 2009, Compactline 102 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 105 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei Compactline 102
vs Rollei RCP-5324
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
Compactline 10225 mm²
RCP-5324- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Compactline 102 and RCP-5324 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Compactline 102MetricRCP-5324
10 MPEffective pixels5 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.58 µmPixel pitch2.23 µm
2.48 µm²Pixel area4.97 µm²
40.26 MP/cm²Pixel density20.13 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
105 gWeight—
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Compactline 102 and RCP-5324 have the same sensor area. The RCP-5324 has the lighter body. The Compactline 102 has the higher effective resolution. The Compactline 102 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose RCP-5324
Released in 2008, RCP-5324 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.