CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei Compactline 101
vs Rollei XS-8 Crystal

Archive illustration for Rollei Compactline 101

Rollei / 2009

Compactline 101

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei XS-8 Crystal

Rollei / 2009

XS-8 Crystal

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
Compactline 101
25 mm²
XS-8 Crystal
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Compactline 101 and XS-8 Crystal have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Compactline 101MetricXS-8 Crystal
10 MPEffective pixels8 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.58 µmPixel pitch1.76 µm
2.48 µm²Pixel area3.11 µm²
40.26 MP/cm²Pixel density32.21 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight114 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Compactline 101 and XS-8 Crystal have the same sensor area. The XS-8 Crystal has the lighter body. The Compactline 101 has the higher effective resolution. The Compactline 101 and XS-8 Crystal were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Compactline 101

Released in 2009, Compactline 101 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose XS-8 Crystal

Released in 2009, XS-8 Crystal has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 114 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras