CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei Compactline 101
vs Rollei XS-10

Archive illustration for Rollei Compactline 101

Rollei / 2009

Compactline 101

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei XS-10

Rollei / 2008

XS-10

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
Compactline 101
25 mm²
XS-10
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Compactline 101 and XS-10 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Compactline 101MetricXS-10
10 MPEffective pixels10 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.58 µmPixel pitch1.58 µm
2.48 µm²Pixel area2.48 µm²
40.26 MP/cm²Pixel density40.26 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight114 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Compactline 101 and XS-10 have the same sensor area. The XS-10 has the lighter body. The Compactline 101 and XS-10 have the same effective resolution. The Compactline 101 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Compactline 101

Released in 2009, Compactline 101 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose XS-10

Released in 2008, XS-10 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 114 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras