CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei Compactline 101
vs Rollei RCP-8330X

Archive illustration for Rollei Compactline 101

Rollei / 2009

Compactline 101

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei RCP-8330X

Rollei / 2008

RCP-8330X

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
Compactline 101
25 mm²
RCP-8330X
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Compactline 101 and RCP-8330X have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Compactline 101MetricRCP-8330X
10 MPEffective pixels8 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.58 µmPixel pitch1.76 µm
2.48 µm²Pixel area3.11 µm²
40.26 MP/cm²Pixel density32.21 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight200 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Compactline 101 and RCP-8330X have the same sensor area. The Compactline 101 has the lighter body. The Compactline 101 has the higher effective resolution. The Compactline 101 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Compactline 101

Released in 2009, Compactline 101 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose RCP-8330X

Released in 2008, RCP-8330X has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 200 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras