Reasons to choose Compactline 101
Released in 2009, Compactline 101 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei Compactline 101
vs Rollei RCP-6324
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
Compactline 10125 mm²
RCP-6324- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Compactline 101 and RCP-6324 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Compactline 101MetricRCP-6324
10 MPEffective pixels6.16 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.58 µmPixel pitch2.01 µm
2.48 µm²Pixel area4.03 µm²
40.26 MP/cm²Pixel density24.8 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight130 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Compactline 101 and RCP-6324 have the same sensor area. The Compactline 101 has the lighter body. The Compactline 101 has the higher effective resolution. The Compactline 101 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose RCP-6324
Released in 2008, RCP-6324 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 6.16 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.