Reasons to choose GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Released in 2009, GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has about 371 mm² of sensor area, 12.3 MP effective resolution, and a 453 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
vs Sony Alpha SLT-A35
VS
Sensor area
371 mm²
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro367 mm²
Alpha SLT-A35- Area ratio
- 1.01:1
- Absolute difference
- 4 mm²
- Relative difference
- 1.1%
The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 MacroMetricAlpha SLT-A35
12.3 MPEffective pixels16.2 MP
23.6 × 15.7Sensor23.5 × 15.6
5.49 µmPixel pitch4.76 µm
30.12 µm²Pixel area22.63 µm²
3.32 MP/cm²Pixel density4.42 MP/cm²
1.53Crop factor1.53
—Maximum video—
453 gWeight415 g
Internal storageStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Lithium-Ion DB-100 rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryRechargeable NP-FW50 battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has the larger sensor area. The Alpha SLT-A35 has the lighter body. The Alpha SLT-A35 has the higher effective resolution. The Alpha SLT-A35 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Alpha SLT-A35
Released in 2011, Alpha SLT-A35 has about 367 mm² of sensor area, 16.2 MP effective resolution, and a 415 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.