CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Ricoh GR II
vs Samsung NX500

Archive illustration for Ricoh GR II

Ricoh / 2015

GR II

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung NX500

Samsung / 2015

NX500

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

371 mm²
GR II
369 mm²
NX500
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
2 mm²
Relative difference
0.4%

The GR II has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

GR IIMetricNX500
16.2 MPEffective pixels28.2 MP
23.6 × 15.7Sensor23.5 × 15.7
4.78 µmPixel pitch3.62 µm
22.87 µm²Pixel area13.08 µm²
4.37 MP/cm²Pixel density7.64 MP/cm²
1.53Crop factor1.53
1,920 × 1,080Maximum video4,096 × 2,160
251 gWeight286 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
Rechargeable Li-Ion battery DB-65 Li-ion batteryBatteryRechargeable Battery BP1130

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The GR II has the larger sensor area. The GR II has the lighter body. The NX500 has the higher effective resolution. The GR II and NX500 were both released in 2015. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose GR II

Released in 2015, GR II has about 371 mm² of sensor area, 16.2 MP effective resolution, and a 251 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose NX500

Released in 2015, NX500 has about 369 mm² of sensor area, 28.2 MP effective resolution, and a 286 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras