CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Ricoh G900
vs Ricoh WG-6

Archive illustration for Ricoh G900

Ricoh / 2019

G900

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Ricoh WG-6

Ricoh / 2019

WG-6

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
G900
28 mm²
WG-6
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The G900 and WG-6 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

G900MetricWG-6
20 MPEffective pixels20 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.19 µmPixel pitch1.19 µm
1.42 µm²Pixel area1.42 µm²
70.28 MP/cm²Pixel density70.28 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
3,840 × 2,160Maximum video3,840 × 2,160
247 gWeight246 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
DB-110 lithium-ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryDB-110 lithium-ion battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The G900 and WG-6 have the same sensor area. The WG-6 has the lighter body. The G900 and WG-6 have the same effective resolution. The G900 and WG-6 were both released in 2019. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose G900

Released in 2019, G900 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 20 MP effective resolution, and a 247 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose WG-6

Released in 2019, WG-6 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 20 MP effective resolution, and a 246 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras