CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Ricoh CX4
vs Ricoh G700

Archive illustration for Ricoh CX4

Ricoh / 2010

CX4

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Ricoh G700

Ricoh / 2010

G700

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
CX4
28 mm²
G700
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The CX4 and G700 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

CX4MetricG700
10 MPEffective pixels12.4 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.69 µmPixel pitch1.51 µm
2.85 µm²Pixel area2.3 µm²
35.14 MP/cm²Pixel density43.57 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
205 gWeight280 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion DB-100 rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBattery2x AAA, Li-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The CX4 and G700 have the same sensor area. The CX4 has the lighter body. The G700 has the higher effective resolution. The CX4 and G700 were both released in 2010. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose CX4

Released in 2010, CX4 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 205 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose G700

Released in 2010, G700 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.4 MP effective resolution, and a 280 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras