Reasons to choose CX3
Released in 2010, CX3 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 206 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Ricoh CX3
vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
CX328 mm²
GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The CX3 and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
CX3MetricGXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
10 MPEffective pixels10 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.69 µmPixel pitch1.69 µm
2.85 µm²Pixel area2.85 µm²
35.14 MP/cm²Pixel density35.14 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
206 gWeight367 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageInternal storage
Lithium-Ion DB-100 rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion DB-100 rechargeable battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The CX3 and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC have the same sensor area. The CX3 has the lighter body. The CX3 and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC have the same effective resolution. The CX3 and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC were both released in 2010. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
Released in 2010, GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 367 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.