CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Ricoh Caplio RX
vs Ricoh Caplio RZ1

Archive illustration for Ricoh Caplio RX

Ricoh / 2004

Caplio RX

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Ricoh Caplio RZ1

Ricoh / 2004

Caplio RZ1

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
Caplio RX
25 mm²
Caplio RZ1
Area ratio
1.17:1
Absolute difference
4 mm²
Relative difference
16.5%

The Caplio RZ1 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

Caplio RXMetricCaplio RZ1
3.1 MPEffective pixels4.19 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.62 µmPixel pitch2.43 µm
6.88 µm²Pixel area5.93 µm²
14.54 MP/cm²Pixel density16.87 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
165 gWeight150 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)Battery2x AA, Li-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Caplio RZ1 has the larger sensor area. The Caplio RZ1 has the lighter body. The Caplio RZ1 has the higher effective resolution. The Caplio RX and Caplio RZ1 were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Caplio RX

Released in 2004, Caplio RX has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 165 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Caplio RZ1

Released in 2004, Caplio RZ1 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.19 MP effective resolution, and a 150 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras