CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Ricoh Caplio RR120
vs Ricoh Caplio RR30

Archive illustration for Ricoh Caplio RR120

Ricoh / 2002

Caplio RR120

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Ricoh Caplio RR30

Ricoh / 2002

Caplio RR30

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

15 mm²
Caplio RR120
21 mm²
Caplio RR30
Area ratio
1.41:1
Absolute difference
6 mm²
Relative difference
40.6%

The Caplio RR30 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

Caplio RR120MetricCaplio RR30
2.2 MPEffective pixels3.24 MP
4.5 × 3.37Sensor5.33 × 4
2.63 µmPixel pitch2.57 µm
6.89 µm²Pixel area6.58 µm²
14.51 MP/cm²Pixel density15.2 MP/cm²
7.7Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
230 gWeight200 g
SmartMediaStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
4x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Caplio RR30 has the larger sensor area. The Caplio RR30 has the lighter body. The Caplio RR30 has the higher effective resolution. The Caplio RR120 and Caplio RR30 were both released in 2002. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Caplio RR120

Released in 2002, Caplio RR120 has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 2.2 MP effective resolution, and a 230 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Caplio RR30

Released in 2002, Caplio RR30 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.24 MP effective resolution, and a 200 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras