CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Ricoh Caplio RR10
vs Ricoh Caplio RR30

Archive illustration for Ricoh Caplio RR10

Ricoh / 2001

Caplio RR10

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Ricoh Caplio RR30

Ricoh / 2002

Caplio RR30

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
Caplio RR10
21 mm²
Caplio RR30
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Caplio RR10 and Caplio RR30 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Caplio RR10MetricCaplio RR30
2.11 MPEffective pixels3.24 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
3.18 µmPixel pitch2.57 µm
10.1 µm²Pixel area6.58 µm²
9.9 MP/cm²Pixel density15.2 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
172 gWeight200 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Caplio RR10 and Caplio RR30 have the same sensor area. The Caplio RR10 has the lighter body. The Caplio RR30 has the higher effective resolution. The Caplio RR30 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Caplio RR10

Released in 2001, Caplio RR10 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 172 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Caplio RR30

Released in 2002, Caplio RR30 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.24 MP effective resolution, and a 200 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras