CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Ricoh Caplio RR1
vs Ricoh RDC-i500

Archive illustration for Ricoh Caplio RR1

Ricoh / 2001

Caplio RR1

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Ricoh RDC-i500

Ricoh / 2001

RDC-i500

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
Caplio RR1
38 mm²
RDC-i500
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Caplio RR1 and RDC-i500 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Caplio RR1MetricRDC-i500
3.9 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.12 µmPixel pitch3.5 µm
9.72 µm²Pixel area12.22 µm²
10.29 MP/cm²Pixel density8.18 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
320 gWeight350 g
SmartMediaStorageCompactFlash type I, CompactFlash type II, Microdrive
Lithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Caplio RR1 and RDC-i500 have the same sensor area. The Caplio RR1 has the lighter body. The Caplio RR1 has the higher effective resolution. The Caplio RR1 and RDC-i500 were both released in 2001. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Caplio RR1

Released in 2001, Caplio RR1 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.9 MP effective resolution, and a 320 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose RDC-i500

Released in 2001, RDC-i500 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 350 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras