CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Ricoh Caplio R8
vs Ricoh CX1

Archive illustration for Ricoh Caplio R8

Ricoh / 2008

Caplio R8

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Ricoh CX1

Ricoh / 2009

CX1

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
Caplio R8
28 mm²
CX1
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Caplio R8 and CX1 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Caplio R8MetricCX1
10 MPEffective pixels9.3 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.69 µmPixel pitch1.75 µm
2.85 µm²Pixel area3.06 µm²
35.14 MP/cm²Pixel density32.68 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
166 gWeight180 g
Internal storageStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion (DB-70) Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion DB-70 rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Caplio R8 and CX1 have the same sensor area. The Caplio R8 has the lighter body. The Caplio R8 has the higher effective resolution. The CX1 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Caplio R8

Released in 2008, Caplio R8 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 166 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose CX1

Released in 2009, CX1 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 9.3 MP effective resolution, and a 180 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras