CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Ricoh Caplio R5
vs Ricoh Caplio RR750

Archive illustration for Ricoh Caplio R5

Ricoh / 2006

Caplio R5

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Ricoh Caplio RR750

Ricoh / 2007

Caplio RR750

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
Caplio R5
25 mm²
Caplio RR750
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Caplio R5 and Caplio RR750 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Caplio R5MetricCaplio RR750
7.1 MPEffective pixels7.21 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.87 µmPixel pitch1.86 µm
3.5 µm²Pixel area3.45 µm²
28.58 MP/cm²Pixel density29.03 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
140 gWeight128 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
Lithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion batteryBattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Caplio R5 and Caplio RR750 have the same sensor area. The Caplio RR750 has the lighter body. The Caplio RR750 has the higher effective resolution. The Caplio RR750 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Caplio R5

Released in 2006, Caplio R5 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 7.1 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Caplio RR750

Released in 2007, Caplio RR750 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 7.21 MP effective resolution, and a 128 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras