CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Ricoh Caplio R2S
vs Ricoh Caplio R3

Archive illustration for Ricoh Caplio R2S

Ricoh / 2005

Caplio R2S

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Ricoh Caplio R3

Ricoh / 2005

Caplio R3

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
Caplio R2S
25 mm²
Caplio R3
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Caplio R2S and Caplio R3 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Caplio R2SMetricCaplio R3
5 MPEffective pixels4.9 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.23 µmPixel pitch2.25 µm
4.97 µm²Pixel area5.07 µm²
20.13 MP/cm²Pixel density19.73 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
150 gWeight135 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Caplio R2S and Caplio R3 have the same sensor area. The Caplio R3 has the lighter body. The Caplio R2S has the higher effective resolution. The Caplio R2S and Caplio R3 were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Caplio R2S

Released in 2005, Caplio R2S has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 150 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Caplio R3

Released in 2005, Caplio R3 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.9 MP effective resolution, and a 135 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras