CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Ricoh Caplio R2
vs Ricoh Caplio RR330

Archive illustration for Ricoh Caplio R2

Ricoh / 2005

Caplio R2

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Ricoh Caplio RR330

Ricoh / 2004

Caplio RR330

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
Caplio R2
25 mm²
Caplio RR330
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Caplio R2 and Caplio RR330 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Caplio R2MetricCaplio RR330
4.9 MPEffective pixels3.34 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.25 µmPixel pitch2.73 µm
5.07 µm²Pixel area7.44 µm²
19.73 MP/cm²Pixel density13.45 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
150 gWeight160 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion batteryBattery1x CR-V3, 2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Caplio R2 and Caplio RR330 have the same sensor area. The Caplio R2 has the lighter body. The Caplio R2 has the higher effective resolution. The Caplio R2 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Caplio R2

Released in 2005, Caplio R2 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.9 MP effective resolution, and a 150 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Caplio RR330

Released in 2004, Caplio RR330 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 3.34 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras