CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Ricoh Caplio GX8
vs Ricoh GR Digital

Archive illustration for Ricoh Caplio GX8

Ricoh / 2005

Caplio GX8

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Ricoh GR Digital

Ricoh / 2005

GR Digital

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
Caplio GX8
38 mm²
GR Digital
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Caplio GX8 and GR Digital have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Caplio GX8MetricGR Digital
8 MPEffective pixels8 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.18 µmPixel pitch2.18 µm
4.74 µm²Pixel area4.74 µm²
21.11 MP/cm²Pixel density21.11 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
205 gWeight170 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion DB-43 rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Caplio GX8 and GR Digital have the same sensor area. The GR Digital has the lighter body. The Caplio GX8 and GR Digital have the same effective resolution. The Caplio GX8 and GR Digital were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Caplio GX8

Released in 2005, Caplio GX8 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 205 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose GR Digital

Released in 2005, GR Digital has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 170 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras