CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Ricoh Caplio GX200
vs Ricoh R8

Archive illustration for Ricoh Caplio GX200

Ricoh / 2008

Caplio GX200

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Ricoh R8

Ricoh / 2008

R8

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

42 mm²
Caplio GX200
28 mm²
R8
Area ratio
1.49:1
Absolute difference
14 mm²
Relative difference
49.2%

The Caplio GX200 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

Caplio GX200MetricR8
12.1 MPEffective pixels10.3 MP
7.53 × 5.64Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.87 µmPixel pitch1.66 µm
3.51 µm²Pixel area2.76 µm²
28.49 MP/cm²Pixel density36.19 MP/cm²
4.6Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
260 gWeight168 g
Internal storageStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion DB-70 rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Caplio GX200 has the larger sensor area. The R8 has the lighter body. The Caplio GX200 has the higher effective resolution. The Caplio GX200 and R8 were both released in 2008. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Caplio GX200

Released in 2008, Caplio GX200 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 12.1 MP effective resolution, and a 260 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose R8

Released in 2008, R8 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.3 MP effective resolution, and a 168 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras