CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Ricoh Caplio GX200
vs Ricoh G600

Archive illustration for Ricoh Caplio GX200

Ricoh / 2008

Caplio GX200

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Ricoh G600

Ricoh / 2008

G600

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

42 mm²
Caplio GX200
28 mm²
G600
Area ratio
1.49:1
Absolute difference
14 mm²
Relative difference
49.2%

The Caplio GX200 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

Caplio GX200MetricG600
12.1 MPEffective pixels10 MP
7.53 × 5.64Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.87 µmPixel pitch1.69 µm
3.51 µm²Pixel area2.85 µm²
28.49 MP/cm²Pixel density35.14 MP/cm²
4.6Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
260 gWeight260 g
Internal storageStorageMultiMedia, SDHC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion DB-70 rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion (DB-60) Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Caplio GX200 has the larger sensor area. The Caplio GX200 and G600 have the same body weight. The Caplio GX200 has the higher effective resolution. The Caplio GX200 and G600 were both released in 2008. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Caplio GX200

Released in 2008, Caplio GX200 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 12.1 MP effective resolution, and a 260 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose G600

Released in 2008, G600 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 260 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras