CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Ricoh Caplio G3
vs Ricoh Caplio RX

Archive illustration for Ricoh Caplio G3

Ricoh / 2003

Caplio G3

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Ricoh Caplio RX

Ricoh / 2004

Caplio RX

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
Caplio G3
21 mm²
Caplio RX
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Caplio G3 and Caplio RX have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Caplio G3MetricCaplio RX
3.1 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
2.62 µmPixel pitch2.62 µm
6.88 µm²Pixel area6.88 µm²
14.54 MP/cm²Pixel density14.54 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
160 gWeight165 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Caplio G3 and Caplio RX have the same sensor area. The Caplio G3 has the lighter body. The Caplio G3 and Caplio RX have the same effective resolution. The Caplio RX is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Caplio G3

Released in 2003, Caplio G3 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Caplio RX

Released in 2004, Caplio RX has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 165 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras