Reasons to choose Caplio 500SE
Released in 2007, Caplio 500SE has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8.1 MP effective resolution, and a 480 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Ricoh Caplio 500SE
vs Ricoh GR Digital II
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
Caplio 500SE40 mm²
GR Digital II- Area ratio
- 1.06:1
- Absolute difference
- 2 mm²
- Relative difference
- 5.9%
The GR Digital II has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
Caplio 500SEMetricGR Digital II
8.1 MPEffective pixels10 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.31 × 5.49
2.16 µmPixel pitch2 µm
4.68 µm²Pixel area4.01 µm²
21.37 MP/cm²Pixel density24.92 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.73
—Maximum video—
480 gWeight168 g
Internal storageStorageMultiMedia, SDHC, Secure Digital
Lithium Ion DB-43 rechargeable battery or AA batteriesBatteryLithium-Ion (DB-60) Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The GR Digital II has the larger sensor area. The GR Digital II has the lighter body. The GR Digital II has the higher effective resolution. The Caplio 500SE and GR Digital II were both released in 2007. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose GR Digital II
Released in 2007, GR Digital II has about 40 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 168 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.