CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Praktica Luxmedia 8003
vs Praktica V2.1

Archive illustration for Praktica Luxmedia 8003

Praktica / 2005

Luxmedia 8003

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Praktica V2.1

Praktica / 2004

V2.1

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
Luxmedia 8003
31 mm²
V2.1
Area ratio
1.23:1
Absolute difference
7 mm²
Relative difference
23.4%

The Luxmedia 8003 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Luxmedia 8003MetricV2.1
8 MPEffective pixels2.1 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor6.4 × 4.8
2.18 µmPixel pitch3.82 µm
4.74 µm²Pixel area14.63 µm²
21.11 MP/cm²Pixel density6.84 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
140 gWeight110 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABattery4x AAA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Luxmedia 8003 has the larger sensor area. The V2.1 has the lighter body. The Luxmedia 8003 has the higher effective resolution. The Luxmedia 8003 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Luxmedia 8003

Released in 2005, Luxmedia 8003 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose V2.1

Released in 2004, V2.1 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 2.1 MP effective resolution, and a 110 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras