CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Praktica Luxmedia 7103
vs Praktica Luxmedia 8203

Archive illustration for Praktica Luxmedia 7103

Praktica / 2007

Luxmedia 7103

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Praktica Luxmedia 8203

Praktica / 2007

Luxmedia 8203

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
Luxmedia 7103
25 mm²
Luxmedia 8203
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Luxmedia 7103 and Luxmedia 8203 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Luxmedia 7103MetricLuxmedia 8203
7.2 MPEffective pixels8.15 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.86 µmPixel pitch1.75 µm
3.45 µm²Pixel area3.05 µm²
28.99 MP/cm²Pixel density32.81 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
140 gWeight110 g
Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Luxmedia 7103 and Luxmedia 8203 have the same sensor area. The Luxmedia 8203 has the lighter body. The Luxmedia 8203 has the higher effective resolution. The Luxmedia 7103 and Luxmedia 8203 were both released in 2007. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Luxmedia 7103

Released in 2007, Luxmedia 7103 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 7.2 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Luxmedia 8203

Released in 2007, Luxmedia 8203 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8.15 MP effective resolution, and a 110 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras