CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Praktica DVC 6.1
vs Praktica Luxmedia 6503

Archive illustration for Praktica DVC 6.1

Praktica / 2007

DVC 6.1

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Praktica Luxmedia 6503

Praktica / 2007

Luxmedia 6503

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
DVC 6.1
25 mm²
Luxmedia 6503
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DVC 6.1 and Luxmedia 6503 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DVC 6.1MetricLuxmedia 6503
6.1 MPEffective pixels6.3 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.02 µmPixel pitch1.99 µm
4.07 µm²Pixel area3.94 µm²
24.56 MP/cm²Pixel density25.36 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
116 gWeight117 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DVC 6.1 and Luxmedia 6503 have the same sensor area. The DVC 6.1 has the lighter body. The Luxmedia 6503 has the higher effective resolution. The DVC 6.1 and Luxmedia 6503 were both released in 2007. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DVC 6.1

Released in 2007, DVC 6.1 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 6.1 MP effective resolution, and a 116 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Luxmedia 6503

Released in 2007, Luxmedia 6503 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 6.3 MP effective resolution, and a 117 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras