CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Praktica DMMC
vs Praktica Luxmedia 6403

Archive illustration for Praktica DMMC

Praktica / 2006

DMMC

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Praktica Luxmedia 6403

Praktica / 2007

Luxmedia 6403

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

17 mm²
DMMC
25 mm²
Luxmedia 6403
Area ratio
1.44:1
Absolute difference
8 mm²
Relative difference
43.8%

The Luxmedia 6403 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DMMCMetricLuxmedia 6403
2 MPEffective pixels6.1 MP
4.8 × 3.6Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.94 µmPixel pitch2.02 µm
8.64 µm²Pixel area4.07 µm²
11.57 MP/cm²Pixel density24.56 MP/cm²
7.21Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
97 gWeight135 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Luxmedia 6403 has the larger sensor area. The DMMC has the lighter body. The Luxmedia 6403 has the higher effective resolution. The Luxmedia 6403 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DMMC

Released in 2006, DMMC has about 17 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 97 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Luxmedia 6403

Released in 2007, Luxmedia 6403 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 6.1 MP effective resolution, and a 135 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras