CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Praktica Digi 3
vs Praktica Digicam 3

Archive illustration for Praktica Digi 3

Praktica / 2005

Digi 3

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Praktica Digicam 3

Praktica / 2004

Digicam 3

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
Digi 3
31 mm²
Digicam 3
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Digi 3 and Digicam 3 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Digi 3MetricDigicam 3
3.2 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
3.1 µmPixel pitch3.15 µm
9.6 µm²Pixel area9.91 µm²
10.42 MP/cm²Pixel density10.09 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
105 gWeight105 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AAABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Digi 3 and Digicam 3 have the same sensor area. The Digi 3 and Digicam 3 have the same body weight. The Digi 3 has the higher effective resolution. The Digi 3 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Digi 3

Released in 2005, Digi 3 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 105 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Digicam 3

Released in 2004, Digicam 3 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 105 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras