CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Praktica Digi 3 LM
vs Praktica V2.1

Archive illustration for Praktica Digi 3 LM

Praktica / 2005

Digi 3 LM

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Praktica V2.1

Praktica / 2004

V2.1

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
Digi 3 LM
31 mm²
V2.1
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Digi 3 LM and V2.1 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Digi 3 LMMetricV2.1
3.2 MPEffective pixels2.1 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
3.1 µmPixel pitch3.82 µm
9.6 µm²Pixel area14.63 µm²
10.42 MP/cm²Pixel density6.84 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
90 gWeight110 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AAABattery4x AAA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Digi 3 LM and V2.1 have the same sensor area. The Digi 3 LM has the lighter body. The Digi 3 LM has the higher effective resolution. The Digi 3 LM is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Digi 3 LM

Released in 2005, Digi 3 LM has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 90 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose V2.1

Released in 2004, V2.1 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 2.1 MP effective resolution, and a 110 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras