CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Praktica DCZ 8.2
vs Praktica Dpix 9000

Archive illustration for Praktica DCZ 8.2

Praktica / 2008

DCZ 8.2

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Praktica Dpix 9000

Praktica / 2008

Dpix 9000

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
DCZ 8.2
28 mm²
Dpix 9000
Area ratio
1.15:1
Absolute difference
4 mm²
Relative difference
14.6%

The Dpix 9000 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

DCZ 8.2MetricDpix 9000
8 MPEffective pixels9 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.76 µmPixel pitch1.78 µm
3.11 µm²Pixel area3.16 µm²
32.21 MP/cm²Pixel density31.62 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight86 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Dpix 9000 has the larger sensor area. The Dpix 9000 has the lighter body. The Dpix 9000 has the higher effective resolution. The DCZ 8.2 and Dpix 9000 were both released in 2008. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DCZ 8.2

Released in 2008, DCZ 8.2 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Dpix 9000

Released in 2008, Dpix 9000 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 9 MP effective resolution, and a 86 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras