CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Praktica DCZ 8.1
vs Praktica Dpix 820z

Archive illustration for Praktica DCZ 8.1

Praktica / 2008

DCZ 8.1

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Praktica Dpix 820z

Praktica / 2008

Dpix 820z

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
DCZ 8.1
25 mm²
Dpix 820z
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DCZ 8.1 and Dpix 820z have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DCZ 8.1MetricDpix 820z
8 MPEffective pixels8 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.76 µmPixel pitch1.76 µm
3.11 µm²Pixel area3.11 µm²
32.21 MP/cm²Pixel density32.21 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
140 gWeight140 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DCZ 8.1 and Dpix 820z have the same sensor area. The DCZ 8.1 and Dpix 820z have the same body weight. The DCZ 8.1 and Dpix 820z have the same effective resolution. The DCZ 8.1 and Dpix 820z were both released in 2008. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DCZ 8.1

Released in 2008, DCZ 8.1 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Dpix 820z

Released in 2008, Dpix 820z has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras