CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Praktica DCZ 7.1
vs Praktica Luxmedia 6105

Archive illustration for Praktica DCZ 7.1

Praktica / 2007

DCZ 7.1

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Praktica Luxmedia 6105

Praktica / 2007

Luxmedia 6105

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
DCZ 7.1
25 mm²
Luxmedia 6105
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DCZ 7.1 and Luxmedia 6105 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DCZ 7.1MetricLuxmedia 6105
7 MPEffective pixels6.36 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.88 µmPixel pitch1.98 µm
3.55 µm²Pixel area3.91 µm²
28.18 MP/cm²Pixel density25.6 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
140 gWeight140 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DCZ 7.1 and Luxmedia 6105 have the same sensor area. The DCZ 7.1 and Luxmedia 6105 have the same body weight. The DCZ 7.1 has the higher effective resolution. The DCZ 7.1 and Luxmedia 6105 were both released in 2007. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DCZ 7.1

Released in 2007, DCZ 7.1 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 7 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Luxmedia 6105

Released in 2007, Luxmedia 6105 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 6.36 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras