CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Praktica DCZ 6.8
vs Praktica Luxmedia 7103

Archive illustration for Praktica DCZ 6.8

Praktica / 2007

DCZ 6.8

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Praktica Luxmedia 7103

Praktica / 2007

Luxmedia 7103

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
DCZ 6.8
25 mm²
Luxmedia 7103
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DCZ 6.8 and Luxmedia 7103 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DCZ 6.8MetricLuxmedia 7103
6 MPEffective pixels7.2 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.03 µmPixel pitch1.86 µm
4.14 µm²Pixel area3.45 µm²
24.15 MP/cm²Pixel density28.99 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
140 gWeight140 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DCZ 6.8 and Luxmedia 7103 have the same sensor area. The DCZ 6.8 and Luxmedia 7103 have the same body weight. The Luxmedia 7103 has the higher effective resolution. The DCZ 6.8 and Luxmedia 7103 were both released in 2007. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DCZ 6.8

Released in 2007, DCZ 6.8 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Luxmedia 7103

Released in 2007, Luxmedia 7103 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 7.2 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras