CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Praktica DCZ 4.1
vs Praktica Luxmedia 6103

Archive illustration for Praktica DCZ 4.1

Praktica / 2003

DCZ 4.1

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Praktica Luxmedia 6103

Praktica / 2004

Luxmedia 6103

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
DCZ 4.1
38 mm²
Luxmedia 6103
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DCZ 4.1 and Luxmedia 6103 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DCZ 4.1MetricLuxmedia 6103
4 MPEffective pixels6 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.08 µmPixel pitch2.51 µm
9.47 µm²Pixel area6.32 µm²
10.56 MP/cm²Pixel density15.83 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
267 gWeight160 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
1x CR-V3, 2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DCZ 4.1 and Luxmedia 6103 have the same sensor area. The Luxmedia 6103 has the lighter body. The Luxmedia 6103 has the higher effective resolution. The Luxmedia 6103 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DCZ 4.1

Released in 2003, DCZ 4.1 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 267 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Luxmedia 6103

Released in 2004, Luxmedia 6103 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras