CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Praktica DCZ 14.2
vs Praktica Luxmedia 16-Z21C

Archive illustration for Praktica DCZ 14.2

Praktica / 2011

DCZ 14.2

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Praktica Luxmedia 16-Z21C

Praktica / 2011

Luxmedia 16-Z21C

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
DCZ 14.2
28 mm²
Luxmedia 16-Z21C
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DCZ 14.2 and Luxmedia 16-Z21C have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DCZ 14.2MetricLuxmedia 16-Z21C
14 MPEffective pixels16 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.43 µmPixel pitch1.33 µm
2.03 µm²Pixel area1.78 µm²
49.19 MP/cm²Pixel density56.22 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight360 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
2x AA Alkaline batteries (1.5V) or Ni-Mh batteriesBattery4 x AA Alcaline or NiMh

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DCZ 14.2 and Luxmedia 16-Z21C have the same sensor area. The DCZ 14.2 has the lighter body. The Luxmedia 16-Z21C has the higher effective resolution. The DCZ 14.2 and Luxmedia 16-Z21C were both released in 2011. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DCZ 14.2

Released in 2011, DCZ 14.2 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Luxmedia 16-Z21C

Released in 2011, Luxmedia 16-Z21C has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16 MP effective resolution, and a 360 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras